Is a policeman authorized to require a vehicle driver to undergo a blood test for the presence of alcohol or intoxicating drugs?
- Correct answer: Yes. A policeman is authorized to require a blood test if he has reasonable suspicion that the driver is under the influence of alcohol or intoxicating drugs.
- No. A policeman is not authorized to require the performance of any test without a court order.
- No. A policeman is not authorized to require a driver to perform a blood test for determining alcohol or intoxicating-drug levels..
- No. A policeman is not authorized to require a driver to perform any type of test, at any given time or place.
Why this is the answer
The correct answer in the official bank: Yes. A policeman is authorized to require a blood test if he has reasonable suspicion that the driver is under the influence of alcohol or intoxicating drugs.
The law allows a policeman to require a blood test when he has reasonable suspicion that the driver is under the influence of alcohol or intoxicating drugs. No court order is needed, and the test is used to determine the level of the substance in the blood. Because impaired driving endangers everyone on the road, police do have the power to test drivers.